Seedream 4.5 vs GPT Image 2
In short: GPT Image 2 follows prompts more precisely and keeps faces more consistent; Seedream 4.5 handles complex requests more often and refuses less. Both are available in one NeuralSpace window.
- Both models in one window, no per-model subscriptions
- Price depends on model and quality — shown before you start
- Edit an uploaded photo with either model
- Tokens are refunded automatically for a failed generation
| Criterion | GPT Image 2 | Seedream 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Face consistency | Keeps faces and features more consistent | Keeps faces well |
| Censorship / refusals | Stricter, refuses more often | Less censorship, refuses less |
| Prompt adherence | Follows the description more precisely | Creatively adds detail |
| Best for | Portraits and accurate photos | Complex art and bold scenes |
NeuralSpace — a platform with neural networks for generating images, video, music, and text in one place.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: Seedream 4.5 or GPT Image 2?
It depends on the task. Need an accurate portrait with a consistent face — choose GPT Image 2. Need complex art with fewer refusals — Seedream 4.5. Both models are available in one NeuralSpace window.
Which model keeps faces more consistent?
GPT Image 2 keeps faces and features more consistent, so it is usually preferred for portraits and photos of people. Seedream 4.5 also holds a face well, but its strength is complex scenes and less censorship.
Is the price different?
Yes, the models cost differently. The final price is shown before generation starts, so you can compare right in the interface before tokens are deducted.