Nano Banana vs GPT Image

In short: Nano Banana is the fast, cheap way to generate and edit photos from a short description; GPT Image 2 follows the prompt precisely, keeps faces consistent and reaches up to 4K. Both models run in one NeuralSpace window.

CriterionNano BananaGPT Image 2
InputsText / PhotoText / Photo (editing)
Resolution1KUp to 4K (1K / 2K / 4K)
Prompt adherenceQuick edits from a short phraseFollows the description more precisely
Speed and priceThe fastest and cheapest generationCostlier, the price is shown before launch
Face consistencyKeeps the face while editingKeeps faces and features more consistent
Best forQuick edits and draftsPortraits and accurate photos
Compare the models on your own images →

NeuralSpace — alusta, joka kokoaa neuroverkot luomiseen: kuvat, video, musiikki, ja teksti yhdessä paikassa.

Usein kysytyt kysymykset

Which is better: Nano Banana or GPT Image?

It depends on the task: fast cheap edits and drafts — Nano Banana; accurate portraits with a consistent face and detailed high-resolution scenes — GPT Image 2. Both models are available in one NeuralSpace window.

Which model edits my photo better?

Both edit an uploaded photo: Nano Banana is faster and cheaper for short edits, GPT Image 2 follows the instruction more precisely and keeps the face and features better.

Is comparing the models paid?

Yes, generation is paid, but no subscription is needed: tokens are charged only for successful results, and the price of each task is visible before it starts. Registration tokens are credited for free.

What is the resolution difference?

Nano Banana generates in 1K — enough for drafts and quick edits; GPT Image 2 produces up to 4K, suitable for print and final assets.