Nano Banana vs GPT Image
In short: Nano Banana is the fast, cheap way to generate and edit photos from a short description; GPT Image 2 follows the prompt precisely, keeps faces consistent and reaches up to 4K. Both models run in one NeuralSpace window.
- Nano Banana: fast and cheap 1K generation, photo edits from one phrase
- GPT Image 2: precise prompt following, consistent faces, up to 4K
- Both models edit an uploaded photo, not only generate from scratch
- Pay per token with no subscriptions, the price is shown before you start
| Criterion | Nano Banana | GPT Image 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Inputs | Text / Photo | Text / Photo (editing) |
| Resolution | 1K | Up to 4K (1K / 2K / 4K) |
| Prompt adherence | Quick edits from a short phrase | Follows the description more precisely |
| Speed and price | The fastest and cheapest generation | Costlier, the price is shown before launch |
| Face consistency | Keeps the face while editing | Keeps faces and features more consistent |
| Best for | Quick edits and drafts | Portraits and accurate photos |
NeuralSpace — eine Plattform mit KI-Modellen für die Generierung von Bildern, Video, Musik, und Text an einem Ort.
Häufige Fragen
Which is better: Nano Banana or GPT Image?
It depends on the task: fast cheap edits and drafts — Nano Banana; accurate portraits with a consistent face and detailed high-resolution scenes — GPT Image 2. Both models are available in one NeuralSpace window.
Which model edits my photo better?
Both edit an uploaded photo: Nano Banana is faster and cheaper for short edits, GPT Image 2 follows the instruction more precisely and keeps the face and features better.
Is comparing the models paid?
Yes, generation is paid, but no subscription is needed: tokens are charged only for successful results, and the price of each task is visible before it starts. Registration tokens are credited for free.
What is the resolution difference?
Nano Banana generates in 1K — enough for drafts and quick edits; GPT Image 2 produces up to 4K, suitable for print and final assets.